“what’s wrong with child pornography — in the sense that it’s just pictures?”–Tom Flanagan.
My Blahg
Meta
Calendar
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | ||||||
Recent Comments
Categories
- CANADA
- -Aboriginal Affairs
- -Canadian Blog Awards
- -Conservative Party
- -Democracy
- -Economy And Taxes
- -Education
- -Elections And Polls
- -Environment
- -Federalism
- -Green Party
- -Healthcare
- -History
- -Hockey
- -Immigration
- -Labour
- -Law And Order
- -Liberal Party
- -London
- -Military
- -Miscellaneous Canada
- -New Democratic Party
- -Privatization
- GENERAL
- WORLD
Archives
| 2010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | |||
| 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr |
| May | Jun | Jul | Aug |
| Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2008 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr |
| May | Jun | Jul | Aug |
| Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr |
| May | Jun | Jul | Aug |
| Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2006 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr |
| May | Jun | Jul | Aug |
| Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2005 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
| Nov | Dec | ||
| 2004 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov | |||
"Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that." Donald Rumsfeld
What an idiot he is. I truly believe he has the Dunning-Kruger effect; thinks he is an expert on all sorts of things, based on having read a bit about them. He has testified for the Crown as an expert witness on some Indian land claims court cases, but I've read one of his reports which showed that he had not done the most basic research.
YOU TOTALLY MISQUOTED THE TEXT FROM THE ARTICLE
Flanagan then continued, saying “But that’s actually another interesting debate or seminar: what’s wrong with child pornography — in the sense that it’s just pictures? But I’m not here to debate that today.”
He said that it was an interesting debate, not the slanderous statement that you implied he said.