Subscribe to comments with RSS

1. Robtarded said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 6:23 pm

   And you believe it’s acceptable to write FUCK THE JEWS in public spaces.

   I think its pretty easy to see who’s reality is demented here.

2. Toronto Tory said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 6:26 pm

   If they’re old enough to have sex, they’re old enough to get beat up.

3. Ti-Guy said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 7:05 pm

   God, I think I’ll go out and shit on the closest cenotaph. Just to prove to you nazis that you’re not intimidating anyone.

   Shitting on war memorials is “freedom of expression” and is protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

   When I do, I’lll invite you all to take a picture.

4. Raging Ranter said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 7:07 pm

   There should be a five year “close in age” exemption. If the perpetrators are, say 17, then we can find a 22 year old somewhere who is willing to kick their asses.

5. Peter said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 7:13 pm

   ‘There should be a five year “close in age” exemption. If the perpetrators are, say 17, then we can find a 22 year old somewhere who is willing to kick their asses.”

   HA HA HA

6. Ti-Guy said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 7:17 pm

   Maybe Peter and RR can Greco-Roman each other and spare the rest of us their over-testosteroned, homo-erotic fantasies of beating up young, nubile Consevatives who expose their genitals in public.

   *shudder*

7. Anonymous said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 7:49 pm

   I like to wipe my butt with pictures of Jack Layton’s face. I hope that it doesn’t become illegal anytime soon, since I’ve just had a big meal.

8. Johan i Kanada said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 7:53 pm

   Robert, please, this is so pathetic. Don’t you have any actual issues to write about.

9. Montreal Simon said,
   July 5th, 2006 at 8:29 pm

   Well at least now, thanks to Jenke’s nutbar posse comitatus post we know exactly where these crazy right wing nuts would like to take Canada. Back to the year 1285. That’s shocking. It’s going to turn the study of wingnutery upside down. The widely accepted view has always been that the ReformCons idea of the good old days went no further back than the mid 1500s. So that’s good to know. On the other hand the increasing tendency of wingnut bloggers to call for mob violence against Muslims, natives, and now young drunken idiots, is something to be worried about. Someone should warn the authorities. Or better still book these monkey nutbars a long-term berth in a lunatic asylum.Before they bite their tails off…

10. Toronto Tory said,
    July 5th, 2006 at 9:10 pm

    .. and later, we’ll see another so called “progressive” blogger complain when someone points out that peeing on war memorials is “left wing” behaviour.

    Yet, this left wing blog is defending the practice.

11. Raging Ranter said,
    July 5th, 2006 at 9:13 pm

    Ti-Guy Says:
    July 5th, 2006 at 7:17 pm | |

    Maybe Peter and RR can Greco-Roman each other and spare the rest of us their over-testosteroned, homo-erotic fantasies of beating up young, nubile Consevatives who expose their genitals in public.

    Net Stalker, you make it sound so dirty.

12. Robert McClelland said,
    July 5th, 2006 at 9:37 pm

    Yet, this left wing blog is defending the practice.

    Once again a conservative demonstrates that lying is a conservative value.

13. wilson61 said,
    July 5th, 2006 at 9:56 pm

    “Yet, this left wing blog is defending the practice.”

    Jack would be so proud of the orange flag waved here.

14. Ti-Guy said,
    July 5th, 2006 at 11:42 pm

    Or better still book these monkey nutbars a long-term berth in a lunatic asylum.Before they bite their tails off…

    Too late. RR’s gushing about how Greco-Roman sounds “dirty.” Diagnosis? No penis. Peter Rempel bit it off.

15. Peter D said,
    July 6th, 2006 at 1:04 pm

    Since they were under 18, wouldn’t taking pictures of them with their pants down be child porn? I guess conservatives value that as well now.

16. Ti-Guy said,
    July 6th, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    Good point. Conservatives are promoting child pornography. Is there no limit to their depravity?

:: Trackbacks/Pingbacks ::

1. Pingback by My Blahg » ANOTHER CASE OF CONSERVATIVE HYPOCRISY - on July 5th, 2006 at 7:17 pm